Tags: mercado san agustin , holiday bazaar , shopping , local
If I wrote, "The market mechanism just doesn't work in education," I'd expect two responses. Some people would nod their heads in agreement, and others would say, "Typical garbage from that America-hating socialist who doesn't think our children should be able to escape our failing public schools."
But what if the person who said that began her statement by saying, "I actually am kind of a pro-market kinda girl. But it doesn't seem to work in a choice environment for education"?
The "pro-market kinda girl" is Margaret Raymond, founding director of the Center for Research on Education Outcomes, usually known by its acronym, CREDO. It's part of the Hoover Institute, not exactly a wild-eyed liberal think tank, and it's funded by pro-privatization, pro-charter types like the Walton Foundation (That's the WalMart family). One of the major missions of CREDO is to study and promote charter schools. Raymond is married to Eric Hanushek, who also works at the Hoover Institute and is one of the deans of the conservative "education reform" movement.
For all her pro-market, pro-charter leanings, Raymond appears to value serious research, which is why I've read her two CREDO studies on the effectiveness of charter schools with interest. They compared similar students in charters and "traditional" — read, "school district" — schools. In the first study, charter school children came out slightly behind "traditional" school students in achievement. In the more recent study, charter school students came out slightly ahead. Actually, both studies were pretty much a wash. It's like saying charter school kids are taller or shorter than "traditional" school kids because their average height differed by a quarter of an inch.
Tags: Charter schools , Center for Research on Education Outcomes , CREDO , BASIS charter schools , Arizona charter schools , Ohio charter schools
Tags: joe pagac , mural , rialto theatre , tucson , chicha dust , new years eve , tropidelica , english beat , live , music , Video
Congressman Raul Grijalva is sounding the alarm on the dangers facing lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youths who are in U.S. custody after being apprehended when they entered the country without documentation. Here's the press release from Grijalva's office:
Today, Congressman Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) led 59 House Democrats in sending a letter to Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell expressing concern over the lack of adequate protection against discrimination and sexual assault for unaccompanied minors in the care of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR). The lawmakers urge HHS to implement robust Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) regulations alongside guidance to protect lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) youth from discrimination.“The unaccompanied minors seeking shelter here risked life and limb to escape violence and poverty in Central America,” said Rep. Grijalva. “Too often, they find themselves exposed to new threats of discrimination and sexual assault once they’re here. These attacks are completely preventable with adequate protections, and HHS has the moral responsibility to ensure those precautions are in place.”
The letter, which particularly focuses on LGBT youths, reads in part:
While less than 10 percent of the general youth population identifies as LGBT, they account for approximately 19 percent of children in foster care and an estimated 15 percent of youth in the juvenile justice system. Data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics indicates that lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) youth in juvenile correctional facilities are almost twice as likely to experience sexual victimization as their heterosexual counterparts. Furthermore, research shows that many of the facilities which ORR contracts to provide care for unaccompanied minors are located in states without adequate protections for LGBT youth.
“We’re talking about protecting kids who are being specifically targeted because of their sexual orientation or gender identity,” Grijalva continued. “LGBT youths must receive affirming and culturally competent care. They deserve the dignity of housing assignments consistent with their gender identity, and adequate preventative and response measures to keep them safe from harm. These kids have traveled thousands of miles in search of safety — allowing them to be victimized once they’re in U.S. custody is completely unacceptable. I urge Secretary Burwell to take the steps necessary to keep these kids safe.”
Tags: usbg tucson , best , bar , bartender , tucson , keith caywood , hotel congress , david clark , barb trujillo , Image
The Arizona Legislature’s efforts to make it harder for women to use medication to terminate their pregnancies hit another roadblock today as the U.S. Supreme Court kept the law on hold pending trial.
The 2012 law created new regulations that required doctors who prescribed the abortion-inducing drug Mifeprex to use protocols that were laid out when the FDA first approved the medication, which limited the use of the drug to the first seven weeks of pregnancy.
Since the drug’s approval 14 years ago, doctors have learned that not only is it safe to use up to nine weeks into a pregnancy, but a lower dose of the drug is effective. Reverting to the old protocols would require that patients make an additional trip to the doctor—a serious problem for women who live in rural areas—and take more medication than needed.
In June, the Federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals put the law on hold, saying that attorneys for Planned Parenthood “have introduced uncontroverted evidence that the Arizona law substantially burdens women’s access to abortion services, and Arizona has introduced no evidence that the law advances in any way its interest in women's health.”
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld that injunction today.
Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said that the court “did the right thing today, but this dangerous and misguided law should never have passed in the first place.”
“Politicians are not medical experts—but politicians have written this law with the ultimate goal of making safe, legal abortion hard or even impossible to access,” Richards continued in a prepared statement. “We are pleased that the courts are recognizing that these unconstitutional laws hurt women and block access to safe medical care.”
Approximately half the women in Arizona who seek abortions use the medication option rather than a surgical procedure. And until another state law required the same facilities for dispensing the medication as performing a surgical abortion, Planned Parenthood could offer medication abortions in Yuma and Prescott. (Because of those restrictions, abortion services are now only available in Tucson, Maricopa County and Flagstaff.)
Tucson Weekly has more background on the state's legal fights over abortion rights here.
Tags: isabella's , ice cream , tucson , handmade , all natural , model t , truck , tucson , rincon market , now open , Image

Link for the auction is right here, and there are plenty of wonderful things to get for yourself or those holiday people in your lives—lot of art made by many of our favorite Tucson artists and plenty of hand-crafted items. Get there now this rainy afternoson and help them end their fundraiser on the best possible note.
Tags: NMWG , Nowhere Man and a Whiskey Girl , online auction , Lupus Foundation of Southern Arizona , Amy and Derrick Ross
Zona Politics Eps.9 from Zona Politics with Jim Nintzel on Vimeo.
A sneak peek of this week's Zona Politics with Jim Nintzel: Mayor Jonathan Rothschild talks about bus fares, the future of Broadway Boulevard, what he's learned over his first term atop the 10th floor of City Hall and more. Then the Zona Politics roundtable panel of Republican National Committeeman Bruce Ash and former Tucson City Councilwoman Carol West talk about the fallout from the Obama administration's executive action on immigration, what Broadway Boulevard should look like and John McCain's criticism of the CIA's torture techniques, as outlined in the Senate Intelligence Committee report released this week.
So, the TUSD board voted for a total of $4.4 million in raises for district employees. That's a serious chunk of change, but it wouldn't be quite as serious if our schools weren't starved for funds. Every spending decision is going to be about robbing Peter to pay Paul — putting off spending for one aspect of the district that really needs money to spend in another — when the legislature insists of robbing our children of the money it takes to educate them. And I mean "robbing" literally. Our Republican-led legislature has been stealing from our schools to the tune of $317 million a year. And that doesn't even factor in our long-standing near-lowest-in-the-nation spending per student, which isn't thievery per se. It's more like a perfectly legal moral failure.
Forgetting whether you think the money is well spent, let's take a look at that $4.4 million and see how much it comes to, Tucson-wise. Here's a math problem for you. How much would each Tucson adult have to pitch in to cover the $4.4 million in employee raises?
Before I give you the figures you need to work out this little story problem, just make a quick estimate in your head, a ballpark figure: $20 per Tucson adult to cover the $4.4 million? $50? $100? More?
Here's the whole story problem, put in good math textbook form. "Tucson has a population of about 600,000, of which about 400,000 are adults. How much would every adult have to contribute to TUSD to cover the $4.4 million in raises it gave to its employees?"
Let's see. Ignore the 600,000 figure, that's just there to confuse you. Divide 4,400,000 by 400,000, and you get . . . $11. That's the answer. Eleven dollars a year. Less than a dollar a month per adult to cover all those raises.
Now let's move the problem out of a 4th grade math book and into the real world. We know the cost wouldn't be split evenly among all income groups. People who make $100,000 or more would probably pay somewhere between $30 and $60 a year — $3 to $5 a month — and low income Tucsonans would pay a few dollars a year, at most — a few cents a month. It's penny ante stuff on a city-wide scale.
Tags: TUSD , Tucson Unified School District , Pay raises , $4.4 million