The Arizona Supreme Court will allow the Invest in Education initiative to appear on the November 2020 ballot after it was previously tossed out by a Maricopa County Superior Court Judge, who ruled its petition summary was “fraudulent or substantially confusing to Arizona voters."
The initiative proposes a 3.5 percent surcharge in state income tax on Arizona’s wealthiest residents—individuals earning more than $250,000 per year or couples earning more than $500,000 per year.
The measure could potentially raise about $940 million in tax revenue per year for the benefit of Arizona public schools and their stakeholders and would affect only the top 1 percent of Arizona earners, according to the Invest in Ed campaign.
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Christopher Coury made the ruling to toss the initiative last month, saying that their 100-word description on petitions signed by voters didn’t include key components of what the initiative would actually do.
The Invest in Education campaign appealed his ruling, and today the Arizona Supreme Court unanimously agreed that the initiative’s description “did not create a significant danger of confusion or unfairness and reverses the trial court ruling.”
“Today’s ruling by the Arizona Supreme Court keeping Invest in Education on the November ballot is an important victory because it gives millions of Arizona voters the opportunity to put more resources into our schools,” said Invest in Education Chairwoman Amber Gould in a press release. “We are confident voters will say ‘yes’ to improving Arizona’s K-12 schools by voting ‘yes’ on Invest in Education this November. The Invest in Education Initiative was crafted to benefit all Arizona’s 1.1 million K-12 students while not taxing working and middle-class families impacted by the pandemic.”
Election officials are expected to complete a review of petition signatures for the proposition this week.
Tags: Invest in Ed , Ballot Initiative , Arizona Supreme Court , Image
If the multiple wildfires that flared throughout Arizona this summer didn’t already strain fire districts’ resources, the COVID-19 pandemic surely did.
The virus outbreak has incurred costs on fire districts ranging from overtime pay for firefighters who cover for their sick co-workers to replacement costs for equipment that was contaminated by COVID-19, according to Pima County officials.
Assistant County Administrator John Voorhees wrote in a memo that the federal government usually provides fire districts with direct emergency funding in a “disaster scenario” such as this, but the process is slow and districts are understandably anxious for extra funds during this time.
In addition, county officials are uncertain about whether the federal government will even approve these types of cost reimbursements.
“Given the rapidly evolving nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal government has not provided well defined guidance regarding acceptable costs under the emergency program,” Voorhees wrote in his memo.
So in the meantime, Pima County has become the go-to agency for doling out emergency federal aid through their pot of CARES Act money. However, the county doesn’t want to be in this position.
“Maintaining accountability for federal funding would be a convoluted task if Pima County were to assume fiscal responsibility for every fire district, charitable organization, and non-profit in the region (over 200 separate entities),” Voorhees wrote.
On April 9, the Arizona Department of Emergency Management and Military Affairs provided training to all affected agencies within Pima County on how to apply for and meet reporting requirements for these types of grants. The training showed agencies how to navigate the application process under the Stafford Act, which dictates how the federal government distributes emergency funding to state and local governments.
According to the memo, Avra Valley Fire District, Drexel Heights Fire District, Green Valley Fire District, Northwest Fire District, Rincon Valley Fire District and Three Points Fire District have submitted applications for funding so far.
But the fire districts are interested in Pima County’s CARES Act funds because they are already accessible at the local level and can be disbursed faster with much less administrative action, Voorhees wrote.
In Maricopa County, some fire districts asked their Board of Supervisors to allocate a portion of their federal CARES Act funding to the districts. On July 29, the Maricopa supervisors set aside $5 million of the $399 million they received from the federal government for the fire districts, according to the memo.
Voorhees recommended the county “encourage each of them to become applicant agents for reimbursement under the Stafford Act.” He wrote this would give each district the autonomy to request funds for their own applicable expenses during the pandemic, while CARES Act funding will only be available until December 31, 2020.
In addition, Voorhees recommended Pima County ask the Board of Supervisors to set aside a portion of their CARES Act funding in order to “meet the immediate needs of the agencies.” In proportion to the funds Maricopa County allocated, this would be around $1.1 million.
He noted that Maricopa County only has four fire districts in their unincorporated jurisdiction, while Pima County has 21 districts.
“The individual impact of the $1.1 million in Pima County will be substantially less, but it will be a good start toward making the fire districts whole as they pursue reimbursement under the Stafford Act process,” Voorhees wrote.
Tags: COVID-19 , Coronavirus , Fire District , CARES Act , Emergency , Federal , Aid , Voorhees , Pima County , Image
Tags: coronavirus , mypillow , political , cartoon , claytoonz , Image
The COVID-19 pandemic has financially impacted a lot of economic sectors, but local restaurants remain one of the hardest hit sectors and they continue to struggle as Arizona and the larger United States fight to control the spread of the virus.
Because of this, the Pima County Board of Supervisors voted yesterday to delay a previously scheduled restaurant permit rate increase and provide credits to businesses that have already paid the higher fee.
According to a county press release, the fee increase was originally adopted in 2016 as a way to recover costs incurred by the Pima County Health Department Consumer Health and Food Safety department. They perform regular restaurant safety inspections and have recently been tasked with enforcing increased health and safety standards in restaurants related to the current public health crisis.
The fee was planned to increase gradually over five years, and the supervisors’ decision yesterday will delay the final increase of 25 percent. The county says these extra costs were partially offset by their Restaurant Incentive Program, which allows restaurants to save up to 25 percent on their permitting fees if they adopt certain practices such as having a certified food handler on staff, eliminating trans-fats in their food and posting nutritional information on their menus.
Restaurants can still apply for these savings through the program, as it is not affected by this recent change in fees. It is currently unclear when the fee might be reinstated.
“The pandemic was a big blow to many local restaurants. We’ve strived to support our restaurants as they adapt, while keeping the broader community safe,” said Director Loni Anderson of the Consumer Health and Food Safety Division. “We know that the vast majority of restaurants have a passion for what they do, and want to do right by their customers. The Restaurant Incentive Program, and today’s delay, are designed to benefit restaurant owners, and the whole of Pima County.”
Tags: COVID-19 , Coronavirus , Pima County , Consumer Health and Food Safety , Fee Increase , Restaurants , Image